IDEA Center's vision on inclusive engagement

Studenten maken selfie

Erasmus University Rotterdam strives to be an engaged university that is locally, regionally, nationally, and internationally connected. To do so effectively, it also requires an internal organisational culture of engagement. As such, engagement is a dynamic and multifaceted process that connects universities with the communities they serve both on campus and beyond. Whether through research, education, direct engagement with society, or organisational culture, engagement is not a one-size-fits-all approach. 

Two employees walking on Woudestein campus.
Alexander Santos Lima

To guide meaningful engagement, IDEA Center at EUR has delineated the IDEA-L principles for inclusive engagement. These five interconnected principles – Inclusive engagement, Diverse engagement, Equitable engagement, Accessible engagement, and Lasting engagement- guide inclusive engagement in all domains of academic life: research, teaching, institutional culture, and partnerships with society. 

These principles are guiding orientations, rather than fixed rules. Think of engagement as a journey, not a destination, for which these principles can function as a guide to help institutions reflect on how engagement is done, who it includes, what it reinforces, and what it might transform. 

IDEA-L principles for inclusive engagement

The IDEA-L principles for inclusive engagement are deeply intertwined with each other and must work together to create meaningful, effective, and long-lasting engagement. Not integrating all principles can create unintended consequences or weaken engagement efforts. For example; Inclusion without accessibility leaves collaborators behind; diversity without equity risks tokenism; equity without inclusion can lead to top-down solutions that do not reflect community needs; inclusion without diversity creates a narrow or homogenous perspective; accessibility without equity means some barriers are removed, but deeper systemic issues remain; and sustainability (lasting) without equity can perpetuate unfair systems - just to name a few. 

To bring these principles to life, we have outlined a set of practical strategies* that translate these principles into action. In addition, we include an in-depth case example which illustrates how these principles can be embedded into every aspect of societal engagement. Taken together, these principles, strategies, and real-life example help us move beyond abstract commitments and ground our approach to engagement in reflection, intentionality, and shared responsibility.

The inclusive engagement principle

We are committed to including all perspectives - especially those who are underrepresented due to systemic barriers - in shaping how we work, what we value, and what we create, both within the university and beyond.

The diverse engagement principle

We embrace all perspectives - ensuring that visible and invisible diversity is reflected in our teams, culture, and partnerships.

The equitable engagement principle

We confront and redress systemic barriers - ensuring that all participants have the resources, opportunities, and power to engage on fair and meaningful terms.

The accessible engagement principle

We address diverse needs (in tone, timing, tools, and formats) so that everyone can participate fully, comfortably, and meaningfully.

The lasting engagement principle

We invest in long-term relationships and structures that support ongoing collaboration and systemic change.

*Note: The strategies listed under each principle are not exhaustive, nor are they intended as a fixed checklist. Their relevance and application will vary depending on the context, the communities involved, and the domain of engagement - whether research, teaching, institutional culture, or external collaboration. Use them as starting points to reflect on what inclusive, diverse, equitable, accessible, and lasting engagement could look like in your specific setting.

It is important to recognize that IDEA-L engagement often requires significantly more time, resources, and relational effort than traditional, transactional forms of engagement. It demands sustained trust-building, meaningful co-creation, and structural responsiveness. However, motivated by both social justice and quality, it leads to more ethical, relevant, and impactful outcomes - and ultimately outperforms conventional approaches in terms of depth, legitimacy, and sustainability.

Read more about inclusive engagement

In the downloads below you will find a document with an overview of IDEA Center's vision on inclusive engagement. Furthermore, you will find our IDEA-L framework for inclusive engagement.

Compare @count study programme

  • @title

    • Duration: @duration
Compare study programmes