PhD defence J.W.G. (Hans) Jansing

Below is a brief summary of the dissertation:

The Netherlands, Singapore, and Switzerland have long been high in international rankings of prosperity and well-being. Other countries struggle to achieve success, and some even fall into decline. This research project examines how countries rise to the top and remain in an ever-changing world. What gives them the energy and makes them adaptive? What role do governments play in this? What can administrators do to keep their countries energized and adaptive, from government leaders to members of parliament?
 
This research project employs a new theory based on the theoretical framework of complexity. This theory incorporates new concepts to analyze and explain the behavior of countries. It is brought to life longitudinally (the history of the Republic of the Seven United Netherlands) and comparatively (the Netherlands, Singapore and Switzerland).
 
When selecting countries, similarities in size and institutional-organizational differences were important criteria. In Singapore, central control prevails, while decentralized self-organization is characteristic in Switzerland. In the Netherlands, there is a mix of both systems. The research reveals that variations in applying these guiding principles are not decisive in achieving top positions. The distinction lies in the interaction between the network architecture, the initial conditions of a country system, and the organization of energy management in the three countries.
 
The Netherlands is interesting because it faces problems that seem difficult to resolve. There are calls for a new culture of governance and new leadership. This research project demonstrates that these two themes only tell part of the story of the Dutch hybrid system. The human genius of administrators can influence system behavior. Still, the development of countries over long periods is embedded in a dynamic that originates in the country's network architecture. Development is fueled by the ability to bring energy into a country and use the energy already there. This can be done in different ways, but it must be done.
 
This study provides the language and concepts needed to visualize spatial connections and patterns in time development. Knowing patterns and relationships helps countries get to the top and stay there. The theory can connect factors in a dynamic interaction. It does not derive from existing historical, economic, or political theories of country development but instead uses insights from those theories.