(Jeff) JJ Rachlinski

Full Professor Erasmus School of Law Civil Law
Burg. Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam

More information

Back to overview


      • J.J. Rachlinski, A.J. Wistrich & C. Guthrie (2017). Judicial Politics and Decisionmaking: A New Approach. Vanderbilt Law Review, 70 (6), 2015-2103.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2017). How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Nudges Cass R. Sunstein's The Ethics of Influence: Government in the Age of Behavioral Science. Texas Law Review, 95 (5), 1061-1076.
      • J.J. Rachlinski & A.J. Wistrich (2017). Judging the Judiciary by the Numbers: Empirical Research on Judges. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2017 (13), 203-229. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085032
      • J.J. Rachlinski, A.J. Wistrich & C. Guthrie (2015). Can Judges Make Reliable Numeric Judgements? Distorted Damages and Skewed Sentences. Indiana Law Journal, 90 (2), 695-739.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2015). Does Empirical Legal Studies Shed More Heat than Light? Ratio Juris (An International journal of jurisprudence and philosophy of law), 28 (4).
      • A.J. Wistrich, J.J. Rachlinski & C. Guthrie (2015). Heart Versus Head: Do judges Follow the Law or Follow Their Feelings? Texas Law Review, 93 (855), 856-923.
      • J.J. Rachlinski, C. Guthrie & A.J. Wistrich (2013). Contrition in the Courtroom: Do Apologies Affect Adjudication? Cornell Law Review, 2013 (paper 604), 1189-1243.
      • A.J. Wistrich & J.J. Rachlinski (2013). How Lawyer's Intuitions Prolong Litigation. Southern California Law Review, 86 (571), 13-91.
      • J.J. Rachlinski, A.J. Wistrich & C. Guthrie (2013). Altering Attention in Adjudication. UCLA Law Review, 60 (6), 1586-1619.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2012). Predictable Misjudgment: How Intuition Produces and Prolongs Conflict. Zeitschrift für Konfliktmanagement, 2012 (5), 149-161.
      • D.M. Kahan, D.A. Hoffman, D. Braman, D. Evans & J.J. Rachlinski (2012). The Saw a Protest: Cognitive Illiberalism and the Speech-Conduct Distinction. Stanford Law Review, 64 (4), 851-906.
      • W. Boyd, D.A. Kysar & J.J. Rachlinski (2012). Law, Environment, and the 'Non-Dismal' Sciences. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2013 (8), 183-211. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1991258
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2012). Judicial Psychology. Rechtstreeks, 2 (1), 15-34.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2011). Evidence-Based Law. Cornell Law Review, 96 (4), 901-923.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2011). The Psychological Foundations of Behavioral Law and Economics. University of Illinois Law Review, 2011 (5), 1675-1696.
      • J.J. Rachlinski, A.J. Wistrich & C. Guthrie (2011). Probability, Probable Cause and the Hindsight Bias. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2011 (8), 72-98.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2011). Processing Pleadings and the Psychology of Prejudgment. DePaul Law Review, 60 (2), 413-430.
      • G.S. Parks & J.J. Rachlinski (2010). Implicit Bias, Election '08 and the Myth of a Post-Racial America. Florida State University Law Review, 37 (659), 659-716.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2010). Why Heightened Pleading - Why Now? Penn State Law Review, 114 (4), 12-47.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2012). How Judges Make Decisions. In R.W.M. Giard (Ed.), Judicial Decision Making in Civil Law: Determinants, Dynamics, and Delusions (Civilologie / Civilology, 4) (pp. 87-108). Eleven International Publishing
      • A.J. Wistrich & J.J. Rachlinski (2017). Implicit Bias in Judicial Decision Making How It Affects Judgment and What Judges Can Do About It (March 16, 2017). Chapter 5: American Bar Association, Enhancing Justice. (Preprints, no No. 17-16). Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper: Cornell doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2934295
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2011, december 8). Dag Van Het Oordeel ('Judgment Day'). The Hague, The Netherlands, Dutch Judicial Council.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2011, november 16). Inside the Judicial Mind: How Judges Decide Cases. Vienna, Lecture at the University of Vienna, Faculty of Law.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2011, januari 19). Blinking on the Bench: How Judges Make Decisions. San Antonio, TX, Texas Litigation Update/Texas Bar Association Annual Meeting.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2011, maart 25). Judicial Decision Making. Paris, France, Symposium on Popular Justice: Beyond Judges and Juries at Ecole Normale Superieure.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2011, augustus 5). Implicit Bias and the Myth of Equal Justice. Toronto, Canada, Presidential Showcase Program, American Bar Association Annual Meeting.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2011, augustus 15). The Working of the Judicial Mind. St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada, Canadian National Judicial Institute Conference on The Art and Craft of Judging.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2011, september 14). New Developments in the Science of Judicial Behaviour. San Diego, CA, American Judges' Association Annual Meeting.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2011, september 22). Decision Making for Administrative Law Judges. Sante Fe, NM, National Association of Administrative Law Judges Annual Meeting.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2011, november 7). Inside the Judicial Mind: How Judges Decide Cases. Den Haag, The Netherlands, Law Firm Pels Rijken.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2011, januari 15). Implicit Bias. Vail, CO, American Bar Association Section on Litigation, Annual Leadership Meeting.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2011, september 23). Inside the Judicial Mind: How Judges Decide Cases. Houston, TX, Texas Association of Civil Appellate and Trial Specialists.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2011, september 30). Psychological Factors Affecting Judicial and Administrative Decision-making. onbekend, Osgoode Center for Professional Development.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2011, september 30). Intuition, Deliberation and Good Judgment. Ontario, Ontario Securities Commission.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2011, september 29). Intuition, Deliberation and Good Judgment. Osgood Hall Law School, Faculty Workshop.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2011, oktober 12). The Working of the Judicial Mind. New York City, New York City Administrative Judicial Institute.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2011, oktober 21). Why Heightened Pleading - Why Now? School of Law, University of Baltimore, Baltimore MD, Matthew Fogg Symposium on The Vitality of Stare Decisis in America.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2011, november 8). Predictable Misjudgment: How Intuition Misleads Lawyers, Judges and Other. Rotterdam, Dies Natalis Erasmus University.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2011, november 21). How Judges Think. Teaneck, New Jersey, New Jersey Judicial College.
      • J.J. Rachlinski (2011). They Saw a Protest, Cognitive Illiberalism and the Speech-Conduct Distinction. Faculty workshop: Erasmus School of Law, Rotterdam (2011, maart 24).
  • Cornell University USA

    Start date approval
    End date approval
    Is current
  • Full Professor

    Erasmus University Rotterdam
    Erasmus School of Law
    Civil Law
    The Netherlands


Visiting address

Burg. Oudlaan 50 3062 PA Rotterdam

Postal address

Postbus 1738 3000 DR Rotterdam