prof.dr.

(Marius) MH van Dijke

Profile

Marius van Dijke is professor of behavioral ethics at Rotterdam School of Management (RSM), Erasmus University. He currently serves as head of the department of Business-Society Management.

His research is concerned with behavioral ethics and leadership of high integrity. Examples of issues he examines in his research include when power stimulates moral and immoral behavior, why people so deeply value social justice, and what the role is of intuitive and controlled processes in moral judgment and behavior. These issues have important implications both for theory and practice, supplying tools that stimulate employees and managers to function both productively and ethically.

He has published widely on these topics in Management and Psychology journals, for instance in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Journal of Management, Journal of Applied Psychology, Leadership Quarterly, and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

Marius served as Director of Doctoral Education of the Erasmus Research Institute  of Management from April 2015 until December 2017. 

• All publications (102)

  • Article (84)

    • Professional Publication (10)

      • M.H. van Dijke (2021). Justice enactment: why some managers treat employees fairly while others don’t. RSM Discovery - Management Knowledge, 39.
      • M.H. van Dijke (2021). The world after COVID-19: how we can do business better. RSM Discovery - Management Knowledge, 39.
      • M.H. van Dijke (2020). Employee motivation in times of organisational hardship. RSM Discovery - Management Knowledge, 38, 22-24.
      • M.H. van Dijke (2018). The influence of power on prosocial behaviour. RSM Discovery - Management Knowledge, 33 (1), 5-7.
      • M.H. van Dijke, S.R. Giessner, R. Van Tulder & R.I. Gilbert (2014). What value ethical leadership? RSM Discovery - Management Knowledge, 18 (2), 8-11.
      • D. De Cremer, G.G. van Houwelingen, I. Cornelis, N. Hoogervorst, L.G.G. Brebels, M.H. van Dijke & A. Van Hiel (2014). Are leaders fair? On the need to understand fairness management in organizations. European Business Review, July-Augus, 6-8.
      • M.H. van Dijke (2013). A broader perspective: Harmonizing leadership activities. RSM Insight, 13 (1), 16-17.
      • D. De Cremer, J.M. Leunissen, C.P. Reinders Folmer & M.H. van Dijke (2012). Sorry limited. Business Strategy Review, 23 (3), 76-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8616.2012.00882.x
      • J.V.R. Van Ruysseveldt & M.H. van Dijke (2012). Wanneer bevordert en wanneer hindert werkdruk het werkplek leren? Gedrag en Organisatie, 25, 28-44.
      • K. Zamani & M.H. van Dijke (2007). Virtueel Laboratorium: Onderzoeken op afstand. De Psycholoog, 42, 379-380.

    • Scholarly Publication (74)

      • G. Van Houwelingen, M.H. van Dijke, D. De Cremer & A. Van Hiel (2021). Cognitive Foundations of Impartial Punitive Decision Making in Organizations: Attribution and Abstraction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, in press. doi: 10.1002/job.2480
      • L.M. Giurge, M.H. van Dijke, X. Zheng & D. De Cremer (2021). Does Power Corrupt the Mind? The Influence of Power on Moral Reasoning and Self-Interested Behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, in press. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.03.003
      • J. Brockner, D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke, B. Holz, L. De Schutter & A. Van Hiel (2021). Factors Affecting Supervisors’ Enactment of Interpersonal Fairness: The Interactive Relationship between Their Managers’ Informational Fairness and Supervisors’ Sense of Power. Journal of Organizational Behavior, in press. doi: 10.1002/job.2466
      • X. Zheng, S. Schuh, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2021). Procedural justice enactment as an instrument of position protection: The three-way interaction between leader’s power position stability, followers’ warmth, and followers’ competence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, in press. doi: 10.1002/job.2493
      • X. Zheng & M.H. van Dijke (2020). Expressing Forgiveness after Interpersonal Mistreatment: Power and Status of Forgivers Influence Transgressors’ Relationship Restoration Efforts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41, 782-796. doi: 10.1002/job.2432
      • X. Zheng, Y. Yuan, M.H. van Dijke, D. De Cremer & A. Van Hiel (2020). The Interactive Effect of a Leader’s Sense of Uniqueness and Sense of Belongingness on Followers’ Perceptions of Leader Authenticity. Journal of Business Ethics, 164, 515-533. doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-4070-4
      • L. Sheppard, J. O'Reilly, M.H. van Dijke, S. Restubog & K. Aquino (2020). The Stress-Relieving Benefits of Positively-Experienced Social Sexual Behavior in the Workplace. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 156, 38-56. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.09.002
      • M.H. van Dijke, N. van Quaquebeke & J. Brockner (2020). In self-defense: Reappraisal buffers the negative impact of low procedural fairness on performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied, 26, 739-754. doi: 10.1037/xap0000303
      • M.H. van Dijke (2020). Power and leadership. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.012
      • M.H. van Dijke, J.M. Leunissen, T. Wildschut & C. Sedikides (2019). Nostalgia Promotes Intrinsic Motivation and Effort in the Presence of Low Interactional Justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 150, 46-61. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.003
      • M.H. van Dijke, L.B. Gobena & P. Verboon (2019). Make me want to pay! A three-way interaction between procedural justice, distributive justice, and power on voluntary tax compliance. Frontiers in Psychology, 10:1632. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01632 [go to publisher's site]
      • M.H. van Dijke, D. De Cremer, G. Langendijk & C. Anderson (2018). Ranking low, feeling high: How hierarchical position and experienced power promote prosocial behavior in response to procedural justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103 (2), 164-181. doi: 10.1037/apl0000260
      • M.H. van Dijke, G. Van Houwelingen, D. De Cremer & L. De Schutter (2018). So gross and yet so far away: Psychological distance moderates the effect of disgust on moral judgment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 689-701. doi: 10.1177/1948550617722198
      • G. Van Houwelingen, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2018). Trust maintenance as a function of construal level and attributions: the case of apologies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 33-46. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2291
      • X. Zheng, M.H. van Dijke, J. Narayanan & D. De Cremer (2018). When expressing forgiveness backfires in the workplace: Victim power moderates the effect of expressing forgiveness on transgressor compliance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27 (1), 70-87. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2017.1392940
      • D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke, M. Schminke, L. De Schutter & J. Stouten (2018). The trickle-down effects of perceived trustworthiness on subordinate performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103 (12), 1335-1357. doi: 10.1037/apl0000339
      • L.B. Gobena & M.H. van Dijke (2017). Fear and caring: Procedural justice, trust, and collective identification as antecedents of voluntary tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 62 (October), 1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2017.05.005
      • G.G. van Houwelingen, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2017). Fairness Enactment as Response to Higher Level Unfairness. The Roles of Self-Construal and Spatial Distance. Journal of Management, 43 (2), 319-347. doi: 10.1177/0149206314530166
      • X. Zheng, M.H. van Dijke, J.M. Leunissen, L.M. Giurge & D. De Cremer (2016). When saying sorry may not help: Transgressor power moderates the effect of an apology on forgiveness in the workplace. Human Relations, 69 (6), 1387-1418. doi: 10.1177/0018726715611236
      • L.B. Gobena & M.H. van Dijke (2016). Power, justice, and trust: A moderated mediation analysis of voluntary tax compliance among Ethiopian small business owners. Journal of Economic Psychology, 52 (February), 24-37. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2015.11.004
      • G. Van Houwelingen, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2015). Getting it done and getting it right: Leader disciplinary reactions to followers' moral transgressions are determined by leader's construal level mindset. The Leadership Quarterly, 26 (5), 878-891. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.06.007
      • P.T.M. Desmet, N. Hoogervorst & M.H. van Dijke (2015). Prophets vs. profits: How market competition influences leaders' disciplining behavior of ethical transgressions. The Leadership Quarterly, 26 (6), 1034-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.07.004
      • E. Bianchi, J. Brockner, K. van den Bos, M. Seifert, H. Moon, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2015). Trust in decision-making authorities dictates the form of the interactive relationship between outcome favorability and procedural fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41 (1), 19-34. doi: 10.1177/0146167214556237
      • S. van Gils, N. van Quaquebeke, D. van Knippenberg, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2015). Ethical leadership and follower organizational deviance: The moderating role of follower moral attentiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 190-203. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.08.005
      • M.H. van Dijke, T. Wildschut, J.M. Leunissen & C. Sedikides (2015). Nostalgia Buffers the Negative Impact of Low Procedural Justice on Cooperation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 127 (March), 15-29. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.11.005
      • A. Joosten, M.H. van Dijke, A. Van Hiel & D. De Cremer (2015). Out of control!? How loss of self-control influences prosocial behavior: the role of power and moral values. PLoS One (online), 10 (5), 1-20. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126377
      • M.H. van Dijke, D. De Cremer, L.G.G. Brebels & N. van Quaquebeke (2015). Willing and Able: Action-State Orientation and the relation between Procedural Justice and Employee Cooperation. Journal of Management, 41 (7), 1982-2003. doi: 10.1177/0149206313478187
      • A. Joosten, M.H. van Dijke, A. Van Hiel & D. De Cremer (2014). Being `in Control' May Make You Lose control: The Role of Self-Regulation in Unethical Leadership Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 121 (1), 1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1686-2
      • P.T.M. Desmet, N. Hoogervorst & M.H. van Dijke (2014). Prophets vs. Profits: How Market Competition Influences Leader's Disciplining Behavior. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014 (1):15818. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2014.119
      • L.G.G. Brebels, D. De Cremer & M.H. Van Dijke (2014). Using self-definition to predict the influence of procedural justice on organizational, interpersonal, and task-oriented citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 40 (3), 731-763. doi: 10.1177/0149206311410605
      • A. Joosten, M.H. van Dijke, A. Van Hiel & D. De Cremer (2014). Feel good, do-good!? On consistency and compensation in moral self-regulation. Journal of Business Ethics, 123 (1), 71-83. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1794-z
      • J.M. Leunissen, D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & C.P. Reinders Folmer (2014). Forecasting Errors in the Averseness of an Apology. Social Justice Research, 27 (3), 322-339. doi: 10.1007/s11211-014-0216-4
      • N. Hoogervorst, D. De Cremer & M.H. van Dijke (2013). When do Leaders Grant Voice? How Leaders' Perceptions of Followers' Control and Belongingness Needs Affect the Enactment of Fair Procedures. Human Relations, 66 (7), 973-992. doi: 10.1177/0018726713482150
      • J. Stouten, M.H. van Dijke, D. Mayer, D. De Cremer & M. Euwema (2013). Can a leader be seen as too ethical? The curvilinear effects of ethical leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 24 (5), 680-695. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.05.002
      • F.M. Cramwinckel, D. De Cremer & M.H. van Dijke (2013). Dirty hands make dirty leaders?! How the touching of dirty objects leads to higher rewards for unethical followers. Journal of Business Ethics, 115 (1), 93-100. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1385-4
      • J.M. Leunissen, D. De Cremer, C.P. Reinders Folmer & M.H. van Dijke (2013). The Apology Mismatch: Asymmetries Between Victim's Need for Apologies and Perpetrator's. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49 (3), 315-324. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.005
      • D.M. Mayer, S. Thau, K.S. Workman, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2012). Leader Mistreatment, Employee Hostility, and Deviant Behaviors: Integrating Self-Uncertainty and Thwarted Needs Perspectives on Deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117 (1), 24-40. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.003
      • B. Geenen, K. Proost, M.H. van Dijke, K. De Witte & J. von Grumbkow (2012). The role of affect in the relationship between distributive justice expectations and applicants' recommendation and litigation intentions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20 (4), 404-413. doi: 10.1111/ijsa.12003
      • P. Verboon & M.H. van Dijke (2012). The effect of perceived deterrence on compliance with authorities: The moderating influence of procedural justice. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 1, 151-161. doi: 10.6000/1929-4409.2012.01.15
      • N. Hoogervorst, D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & D.M. Mayer (2012). When do leaders sacrifice? The effects of sense of power and belongingness on leader self-sacrifice. The Leadership Quarterly, 23 (5), 883-896. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.05.006
      • B. Geenen, K. Proost, B. Schreurs, M.H. van Dijke, E. Derous, K. De Witte & J. von Grumbkow (2012). The influence of general beliefs on the formation of justice expectations: The moderating role of direct experiences. Career Development International, 17 (1), 67-82. doi: 10.1108/13620431211201337
      • M.H. van Dijke, D. De Cremer, D.M. Mayer & N. van Quaquebeke (2012). When Does Procedural Fairness Promote Organizational Citizenship Behavior?: Integrating Empowering Leadership Types in Relational Justice Models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117 (2), 235-248. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.10.006
      • K. Proost, J. Van Ruysseveldt & M.H. van Dijke (2012). Coping with unmet expectations: Learning opportunities as a buffer against emotional exhaustion and turnover intentions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21 (1), 7-27. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2010.526304
      • J. Stouten, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2012). Ethical leadership. An overview and future perspecfives. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11 (1), 1-6. doi: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000059
      • L.G.G. Brebels, D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & A. van Hiel (2011). Fairness as social responsibility: a moral self-regulation account of procedural justice enactment. British Journal of Management, 22 (SI), S47-S58. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00715.x
      • J. Van Ruysseveldt & M.H. Van Dijke (2011). When Are workload and workplace learning opportunities related in a curvilinear manner? The moderating role of autonomy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79 (2), 470-483. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.03.003
      • P. Verboon & M.H. van Dijke (2011). When do severe sanctions enhance compliance? The role of procedural fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32 (1), 120-130. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2010.09.007
      • M.H. Van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2011). When social accounts promote acceptance of unfair ultimatum offers: The role of the victim's stress responses to uncertainty and power position. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32 (3), 468-479. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2011.03.014
      • D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & D.M. Mayer (2010). Cooperating when "you" and "I" are treated fairly: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95 (6), 1121-1133. doi: 10.1037/a0020419
      • D. De Cremer, J. Brockner, A. Fishman, M.H. Van Dijke, W. van Olffen & D.M. Mayer (2010). When do procedural fairness and outcome fairness interact to influence employees' work attitudes and behaviors? The moderation effect of uncertainty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95 (2), 291-304. doi: 10.1037/a0017866
      • D. De Cremer, A. Tenbrunsel & M.H. van Dijke (2010). Regulating Ethical Failures: Insights from Psychology. Journal of Business Ethics, 95 (supplement 1), 1-6. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0789-x
      • N. Hoogervoorst, D. De Cremer & M.H. van Dijke (2010). Why Leaders Not Always Disapprove of Unethical Follower Behavior: It depends on the leader's self-interest and accountability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95 (supplement 1), 29-41. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0793-1
      • M.H. Van Dijke, D. De Cremer & D. Mayer (2010). The role of authority power in explaining procedural fairness effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95 (3), 488-502. doi: 10.1037/a0018921
      • M.H. van Dijke & P. Verboon (2010). Trust in authorities as a boundary condition to procedural fairness effects on tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31 (1), 80-91. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2009.10.005
      • M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2010). Procedural fairness and endorsement of prototypical leaders: Leader benevolence or follower control? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46 (1), 85-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.004
      • D. De Cremer, D.M. Mayer, M.H. van Dijke, B.C. Schouten & M. Bardes (2009). When does self-sacrificial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on followers¿ prevention focus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94 (4), 887-899. doi: 10.1037/a0014782
      • G. Langendijk, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2009). How power and trust explain procedural fairness effects on self-esteem. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65, 118-126. doi: 10.1007/BF03080134
      • D. De Cremer & M.H. van Dijke (2009). On the psychology of justice as a social regulation tool. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65 (4), 114-117. doi: 10.1007/BF03080133
      • M.H. van Dijke, D. De Cremer, P. Schefferlie & A.E.R. Bos (2009). Procedural and interpersonal fairness moderate the relationship between outcome fairness and acceptance of merit pay. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18 (1), 8-28. doi: 10.1080/13594320701856699
      • D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke, L.G.G. Brebels & N. Hoogervorst (2008). How intergroup dynamics influence within-group cooperation: The case of prototypical leadership and procedural fairness. Psychologica Belgica, 48, 157-175. doi: 10.5334/pb-48-2-3-157
      • M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2008). How leader prototypicality influences followers’ status: The role of procedural fairness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17 (2), 226-250. doi: 10.1080/13594320701743491
      • J.W. Van Prooijen, D. De Cremer, I. Van Beest, T. Stahl, M.H. van Dijke & P. Van Lange (2008). The egocentric nature of procedural justice: Social value orientation as moderator of reactions to decision-making procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44 (5), 1303-1315. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.05.006
      • C. Bolman, L. Lechner & M.H. van Dijke (2007). Question order in the assessment of misperception of physical activity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 4, 42. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-4-42
      • D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & A.E.R. Bos (2007). When leaders are seen as transformational: The effects of organizational justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37 (8), 1797-1816. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00238.x
      • M.H. van Dijke & M. Poppe (2007). Motivations underlying power dynamics in hierarchically structured groups. Small Group Research, 38, 643-669. doi: 10.1177/1046496407304339
      • P. Verboon & M.H. van Dijke (2007). A self-interest analysis of tax compliance: How distributive justice moderates the effect of outcome favorability. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 704-727. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.004
      • D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & A. Bos (2006). Leader's procedural justice affecting identification and trust. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 27, 554-565. doi: 10.1108/01437730610692416
      • D. De Cremer, D. van Knippenberg, M.H. van Dijke & A.E.R. Bos (2006). Self-sacrificial leadership and follower self-esteem: When collective identification matters. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 10, 233-245. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.10.3.233
      • L. Lechner, C. Bolman & M.H. van Dijke (2006). Factors related to misperception of physical activity in the Netherlands and implications for health promotion programs. Health Promotion International, 21, 104-112. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dal011
      • M.H. van Dijke & M. Poppe (2006). Striving for personal power as a basis for social power dynamics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 537-556. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.351
      • D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & A.E.R. Bos (2004). Distributive justice moderating the effects of self-sacrificial leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 25 (5), 466-475. doi: 10.1108/01437730410544773
      • D. De Cremer, D. van Knippenberg, M.H. van Dijke & A. Bos (2004). How Self-Relevant is Fair Treatment? Social Self-Esteem Moderates Interactional Justice Effects. Social Justice Research, 17, 407-419. doi: 10.1007/s11211-004-2059-x
      • M.H. van Dijke & M. Poppe (2004). Social comparison of power: Interpersonal versus intergroup effects. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 8, 13-26. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.8.1.13
      • M.H. van Dijke & M. Poppe (2003). Preferred changes in power differences: Effects of social comparison in equal and unequal power relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 149-160. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00524-3

  • Part of book - Chapter (8)

    • Professional Publication (4)

      • K. Proost & M.H. van Dijke (2009). Werving van personeel. In M..H. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch Selecteren. Groningen: Noordhoff Publishers
      • M.H. van Dijke & K. Proost (2009). Voorselectie. In M. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch selecteren (pp. 149-160). Groningen, The Netherlands:: Noordhoff Publishers.
      • M.H. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (2009). Trends in selectie. In M. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch Selecteren (pp. 263-276). Groningen: Noordhoff Publishers
      • K. Könings & M.H. van Dijke (2009). Predictoren en criteria. In M. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch Selecteren (pp. 59-78). Groningnen: Noordhoff Publishers

    • Scholarly Publication (4)

      • P. Manjunath & M.H. van Dijke (2019). Trickle-down effects of unethical behavior: The role of meaning making. In D. Wasieleski & J. Weber (Eds.), BAS 360 series on Business Ethics. Bingley, UK: Emerald doi: 10.1108/S2514-175920190000003004
      • M.H. van Dijke, G. van Houwelingen, N. Hoogervorst & L. Versteegt (2018). Reflection and action: A study on moral learning consultation within Dutch prison authorities. In M. Kowalski (Ed.), Ethics of counterterrorism. Amsterdam: Boom
      • M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2014). Justice in the work setting. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research. Springer
      • D. De Cremer & M.H. van Dijke (2009). Acting fairly to be the boss: Procedural justice as a tool to affirm power relationships with subordinates. In D. Tjosvold & B.M. van Knippenberg-Wisse (Eds.), Power and interdependence in organizations (pp. 118-132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

  • Book editorship (1)

    • M.H. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Ed.). (2009). Strategisch selecteren. Groningen / Houten: Noordhoff Publishers

  • Report (1)

    • G. Van Houwelingen, N. Hoogervorst & M.H. van Dijke (2015). Reflectie en actie. Een onderzoek naar moreel leeroverleg binnen Dienst Justitiële Instellingen (DJI). [Reflection and action. A study on moral learning consultation within DJI]. (Extern rapport). den Haag: WODC, ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie

  • Internet article (3)

    • N. Hoogervorst, D. De Cremer & M.H. van Dijke (2014). How Employees Win ‘Voice’ and Influence Decisions. (nieuwsbrief). Ideas for Leaders.
    • J. Stouten, M.H. van Dijke, D. Mayer, D. De Cremer & M. Euwema (2014). Can a Leader Be Too Ethical? (nieuwsbrief). Ideas for Leaders.
    • P.T.M. Desmet, N. Hoogervorst & M.H. van Dijke (2014). Profits Vs Principles: Market Competition and Moral Transgression. (nieuwsbrief). Ideas for Leaders. (available: 1 May 2015). doi: 10.13007/380

  • Book / Monograph / Book editorial (1)

    • J. Syroit, E. Derous, M. Hommes, H. Lodewijckx, M.H. van Dijke & P. Poelmans (2002). Interventies in groepen: conflicthantering en mediation. Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland

  • Other output (1)

    • G.N.G. Vanderveen, V.A.J. Frissen, H.W. Volberda & M.H. van Dijke (2018). International working conference on visualizations & law – Small grant of the Erasmus Initiative Dynamics of Inclusive Prosperity.

  • Inaugural speech (1)

    • M.H. van Dijke (2014). Understanding immoral conduct in business settings. A behavioural ethics approach. (2014, december 19). Rotterdam: Erasmus Research Institute of Management

  • Doctoral thesis (1)

    • M.H. van Dijke. Understanding power dynamics. Effects of social comparison on tendencies to change power and power differences. UvT Prom./coprom.: M. Poppe & J. Rijsman.

  • Award (1)

    • P.T.M. Desmet, N. Hoogervorst & M.H. van Dijke (2014). Prophets vs. Profits: How Market Competition influences Leaders’ Disciplining Behavior. Best OB Paper Award for Outstanding Practical Implications for Management: . Populariserende publicatie.

• Ancillary activities (1)

  Nottingham Business School, Nottingham Trent Univ.

  Start date approval

  Dec/2018

  End date approval

  Nov/2021

  Place

  NOTTINGHAM

• Teaching (7)

  Leiderschap, Management en Bestuur

  Title

  Leiderschap, Management en Bestuur

  Year

  2020

  Leadership, sustainability & governance

  Title

  Leadership, sustainability & governance

  Year

  2020

  Year level

  bachelor 2, pre-master

  Philosophy of Science

  Title

  Philosophy of Science

  Year

  2020

  Year level

  bachelor 1

  Open Science & Scientific Integrity

  Title

  Open Science & Scientific Integrity

  Year

  2020

  Year level

  PhD, master

  Leadership, Sustainability & Governance

  Title

  Leadership, Sustainability & Governance

  Year

  2020

  Year level

  bachelor 2, bachelor 2, pre-master

  LMB1, Leiderschap, management & bestuur

  Title

  LMB1, Leiderschap, management & bestuur

  Year

  2020

  LMB2, Majorgebonden methodologie Seminar

  Title

  LMB2, Majorgebonden methodologie Seminar

  Year

  2020

• PhD list (12)

  • Leander De Schutter

    Open PhD projects in Value Based Organizing: Acting on unprecedented change

    • 2018 -

  • Lisanne Versteegt

    Taking a moral intuition approach to behavioral ethics: On the nature of moral intuitions underlying (un)ethical behaviors in organizations

    • 2015 -

  • Lisanne Versteegt

    Taking a moral intuition approach to behavioral ethics: On the nature of moral intuitions underlying (un)ethical behaviors in organizations

    • 2015 -
  • Laura M. Giurge

    A Test of Time: A temporal and dynamic approach to power and ethics

    • 2012 - 2017
  • Lemessa Bayissa Gobena

    Towards Integrating Antecedents of Voluntary Tax Compliance

    • 2012 - 2017
  • Franziska Zuber

    Looking at the Others. Studies on (un)ethical behavior and social relationships in organizations

    • 2012 - 2016
  • Philip Eskenazi

    The Accountable Animal: Naturalising the management control problem

    • 2011 - 2015
  • Gijs van Houwelingen

    Something to Rely On: The Influence of Stable and Fleeting Drivers on Moral Behavior

    • 2010 - 2015
  • Pieter Desmet

    In Money we Trust? Trust Repair and the Psychology of Financial Compensations

    • 2010 - 2011
  • Joost Leunissen

    All Apologies: On the willingness of perpetrators to apologize

    • 2009 - 2014

  • Niek Hoogervorst

    On The Psychology of Displaying Ethical Leadership. A Behavioral Ethics Approach

    • 2009 - 2011
  • Pepijn van Neerijnen

    The Adaptive Organization: The Socio-Cognitive Antecedents of Ambidexterity and Individual Exploration

    • 2008 - 2016

• Present position

  Full Professor

  University

  Erasmus University Rotterdam

  School

  RSM - Rotterdam School of Management

  Department

  Department of Business-Society Management

  Telephone

  0104081913