Current facets (Pre-Master)
prof.dr. (Marius) M.H. van Dijke
Endowed Professor in Behavioral Ethics
Endowed Professor RSM - Rotterdam School of Management Department of Business-Society Management
- Location
- Erasmus University Rotterdam
- Room
- T 11-57
- Telephone
- +31 10 4081913
- mvandijke@rsm.nl
‹ Back to overview
Profile
Marius van Dijke is professor of behavioral ethics at Rotterdam School of Management (RSM), Erasmus University and Scientific Director of the Erasmus Centre of Behavioural Ethics (ECBE…
Marius van Dijke is professor of behavioral ethics at Rotterdam School of Management (RSM), Erasmus University and Scientific Director of the Erasmus Centre of Behavioural Ethics (ECBE).
His research is concerned with behavioral ethics and leadership of high integrity. Examples of issues he examines in his research include when power stimulates moral and immoral behavior, why people so deeply value social justice, and what the role is of intuitive and controlled processes in moral judgment and behavior. These issues have important implications both for theory and practice, supplying tools that stimulate employees and managers to function both productively and ethically.
He has published widely on these topics in Management and Psychology journals, for instance in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Journal of Management, Journal of Applied Psychology, Leadership Quarterly, and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
Marius served as Director of Doctoral Education of the Erasmus Research Institute of Management from April 2015 until December 2017.
For information about ECBE, click here
- M.H. van Dijke (2018). The influence of power on prosocial behaviour. RSM Discovery - Management Knowledge, 33 (1), 5-7.
- M.H. van Dijke, S.R. Giessner, R. Van Tulder & R.I. Gilbert (2014). What value ethical leadership? RSM Discovery - Management Knowledge, 18 (2), 8-11.
- D. De Cremer, G.G. van Houwelingen, I. Cornelis, N. Hoogervorst, L.G.G. Brebels, M.H. van Dijke & A. Van Hiel (2014). Are leaders fair? On the need to understand fairness management in organizations. European Business Review, July-Augus, 6-8.
- M.H. van Dijke (2013). A broader perspective: Harmonizing leadership activities. RSM Insight, 13 (1), 16-17.
- D. De Cremer, J.M. Leunissen, C.P. Reinders Folmer & M.H. van Dijke (2012). Sorry limited. Business Strategy Review, 23 (3), 76-77. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8616.2012.00882.x[go to publisher's site]
- J.V.R. Van Ruysseveldt & M.H. van Dijke (2012). Wanneer bevordert en wanneer hindert werkdruk het werkplek leren? Gedrag en Organisatie, 25, 28-44.
- K. Zamani & M.H. van Dijke (2007). Virtueel Laboratorium: Onderzoeken op afstand. De Psycholoog, 42, 379-380.
- D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke, M. Schminke, L. De Schutter & J. Stouten (2018). The trickle-down effects of perceived trustworthiness on subordinate performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, Accepted.
- G. Van Houwelingen, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2018). Trust maintenance as a function of construal level and attributions: the case of apologies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 33-46.
- M.H. van Dijke, G. Van Houwelingen, D. De Cremer & L. De Schutter (2018). So gross and yet so far away: Psychological distance moderates the effect of disgust on moral judgment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 689-701.
- M.H. van Dijke, D. De Cremer, G. Langendijk & C. Anderson (2018). Ranking low, feeling high: How hierarchical position and experienced power promote prosocial behavior in response to procedural justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103 (2), 164-181. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/apl0000260
- X. Zheng, M.H. van Dijke, J. Narayanan & D. De Cremer (2018). When expressing forgiveness backfires in the workplace: Victim power moderates the effect of expressing forgiveness on transgressor compliance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27 (1), 70-87. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1392940[go to publisher's site]
- L.B. Gobena & M.H. van Dijke (2017). Fear and caring: Procedural justice, trust, and collective identification as antecedents of voluntary tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 62 (October), 1-16. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.05.005[go to publisher's site]
- G.G. van Houwelingen, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2017). Fairness Enactment as Response to Higher Level Unfairness. The Roles of Self-Construal and Spatial Distance. Journal of Management, 43 (2), 319-347. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206314530166[go to publisher's site]
- X. Zheng, M.H. van Dijke, J.M. Leunissen, L.M. Giurge & D. De Cremer (2016). When saying sorry may not help: Transgressor power moderates the effect of an apology on forgiveness in the workplace. Human Relations, 69 (6), 1387-1418. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726715611236[go to publisher's site]
- L.B. Gobena & M.H. van Dijke (2016). Power, justice, and trust: A moderated mediation analysis of voluntary tax compliance among Ethiopian small business owners. Journal of Economic Psychology, 52 (February), 24-37. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.11.004
- G. Van Houwelingen, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2015). Getting it done and getting it right: Leader disciplinary reactions to followers' moral transgressions are determined by leader's construal level mindset. The Leadership Quarterly, 26 (5), 878-891. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.06.007[go to publisher's site]
- E. Bianchi, J. Brockner, K. van den Bos, M. Seifert, H. Moon, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2015). Trust in decision-making authorities dictates the form of the interactive relationship between outcome favorability and procedural fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41 (1), 19-34. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167214556237[go to publisher's site]
- S. van Gils, N. van Quaquebeke, D. van Knippenberg, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2015). Ethical leadership and follower organizational deviance: The moderating role of follower moral attentiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 190-203. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.08.005[go to publisher's site]
- M.H. van Dijke, D. De Cremer, L.G.G. Brebels & N. van Quaquebeke (2015). Willing and Able: Action-State Orientation and the relation between Procedural Justice and Employee Cooperation. Journal of Management, 41 (7), 1982-2003. doi: http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478187[go to publisher's site]
- M.H. van Dijke, T. Wildschut, J.M. Leunissen & C. Sedikides (2015). Nostalgia Buffers the Negative Impact of Low Procedural Justice on Cooperation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 127 (March), 15-29. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.11.005
- P.T.M. Desmet, N. Hoogervorst & M.H. van Dijke (2015). Prophets vs. profits: How market competition influences leaders' disciplining behavior of ethical transgressions. The Leadership Quarterly, 26 (6), 1034-1050. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.07.004
- A. Joosten, M.H. van Dijke, A. Van Hiel & D. De Cremer (2015). Out of control!? How loss of self-control influences prosocial behavior: the role of power and moral values. PLoS One (online), 10 (5), 1-20. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126377[go to publisher's site]
- P.T.M. Desmet, N. Hoogervorst & M.H. van Dijke (2014). Prophets vs. Profits: How Market Competition Influences Leader's Disciplining Behavior. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014 (1):15818. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2014.119
- J.M. Leunissen, D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & C.P. Reinders Folmer (2014). Forecasting Errors in the Averseness of an Apology. Social Justice Research, 27 (3), 322-339. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0216-4
- L.G.G. Brebels, D. De Cremer & M.H. Van Dijke (2014). Using self-definition to predict the influence of procedural justice on organizational, interpersonal, and task-oriented citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 40 (3), 731-763. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410605[go to publisher's site]
- A. Joosten, M.H. van Dijke, A. Van Hiel & D. De Cremer (2014). Feel good, do-good!? On consistency and compensation in moral self-regulation. Journal of Business Ethics, 123 (1), 71-83. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1794-z[go to publisher's site]
- A. Joosten, M.H. van Dijke, A. Van Hiel & D. De Cremer (2014). Being `in Control' May Make You Lose control: The Role of Self-Regulation in Unethical Leadership Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 121 (1), 1-14. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1686-2[go to publisher's site]
- N. Hoogervorst, D. De Cremer & M.H. van Dijke (2013). When do Leaders Grant Voice? How Leaders' Perceptions of Followers' Control and Belongingness Needs Affect the Enactment of Fair Procedures. Human Relations, 66 (7), 973-992. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726713482150[go to publisher's site]
- J. Stouten, M.H. van Dijke, D. Mayer, D. De Cremer & M. Euwema (2013). Can a leader be seen as too ethical? The curvilinear effects of ethical leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 24 (5), 680-695. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.05.002[go to publisher's site]
- J.M. Leunissen, D. De Cremer, C.P. Reinders Folmer & M.H. van Dijke (2013). The Apology Mismatch: Asymmetries Between Victim's Need for Apologies and Perpetrator's. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49 (3), 315-324. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.005[go to publisher's site]
- F.M. Cramwinckel, D. De Cremer & M.H. van Dijke (2013). Dirty hands make dirty leaders?! How the touching of dirty objects leads to higher rewards for unethical followers. Journal of Business Ethics, 115 (1), 93-100. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1385-4[go to publisher's site]
- D.M. Mayer, S. Thau, K.S. Workman, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2012). Leader Mistreatment, Employee Hostility, and Deviant Behaviors: Integrating Self-Uncertainty and Thwarted Needs Perspectives on Deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117 (1), 24-40. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.003[go to publisher's site]
- K. Proost, J. Van Ruysseveldt & M.H. van Dijke (2012). Coping with unmet expectations: Learning opportunities as a buffer against emotional exhaustion and turnover intentions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21 (1), 7-27. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.526304[go to publisher's site]
- J. Stouten, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2012). Ethical leadership. An overview and future perspecfives. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11 (1), 1-6. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000059[go to publisher's site]
- M.H. van Dijke, D. De Cremer, D.M. Mayer & N. van Quaquebeke (2012). When Does Procedural Fairness Promote Organizational Citizenship Behavior?: Integrating Empowering Leadership Types in Relational Justice Models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117 (2), 235-248. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.10.006[go to publisher's site]
- B. Geenen, K. Proost, B. Schreurs, M.H. van Dijke, E. Derous, K. De Witte & J. von Grumbkow (2012). The influence of general beliefs on the formation of justice expectations: The moderating role of direct experiences. Career Development International, 17 (1), 67-82. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13620431211201337[go to publisher's site]
- N. Hoogervorst, D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & D.M. Mayer (2012). When do leaders sacrifice? The effects of sense of power and belongingness on leader self-sacrifice. The Leadership Quarterly, 23 (5), 883-896. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.05.006[go to publisher's site]
- P. Verboon & M.H. van Dijke (2012). The effect of perceived deterrence on compliance with authorities: The moderating influence of procedural justice. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 1, 151-161.
- B. Geenen, K. Proost, M.H. van Dijke, K. De Witte & J. von Grumbkow (2012). The role of affect in the relationship between distributive justice expectations and applicants' recommendation and litigation intentions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20 (4), 404-413. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12003[go to publisher's site]
- P. Verboon & M.H. van Dijke (2011). When do severe sanctions enhance compliance? The role of procedural fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32 (1), 120-130. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.09.007[go to publisher's site]
- M.H. Van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2011). When social accounts promote acceptance of unfair ultimatum offers: The role of the victim's stress responses to uncertainty and power position. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32 (3), 468-479. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.03.014[go to publisher's site]
- L.G.G. Brebels, D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & A. van Hiel (2011). Fairness as social responsibility: a moral self-regulation account of procedural justice enactment. British Journal of Management, 22 (SI), S47-S58. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00715.x[go to publisher's site]
- J. Van Ruysseveldt & M.H. Van Dijke (2011). When Are workload and workplace learning opportunities related in a curvilinear manner? The moderating role of autonomy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79 (2), 470-483. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.03.003[go to publisher's site]
- M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2010). Procedural fairness and endorsement of prototypical leaders: Leader benevolence or follower control? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46 (1), 85-96. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.004[go to publisher's site]
- M.H. Van Dijke, D. De Cremer & D. Mayer (2010). The role of authority power in explaining procedural fairness effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95 (3), 488-502. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018921[go to publisher's site]
- D. De Cremer, J. Brockner, A. Fishman, M.H. Van Dijke, W. van Olffen & D.M. Mayer (2010). When do procedural fairness and outcome fairness interact to influence employees' work attitudes and behaviors? The moderation effect of uncertainty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95 (2), 291-304. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017866[go to publisher's site]
- M.H. van Dijke & P. Verboon (2010). Trust in authorities as a boundary condition to procedural fairness effects on tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31 (1), 80-91. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.10.005
- N. Hoogervoorst, D. De Cremer & M.H. van Dijke (2010). Why Leaders Not Always Disapprove of Unethical Follower Behavior: It depends on the leader's self-interest and accountability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95 (supplement 1), 29-41. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0793-1[go to publisher's site]
- D. De Cremer, A. Tenbrunsel & M.H. van Dijke (2010). Regulating Ethical Failures: Insights from Psychology. Journal of Business Ethics, 95 (supplement 1), 1-6. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0789-x[go to publisher's site]
- D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & D.M. Mayer (2010). Cooperating when "you" and "I" are treated fairly: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95 (6), 1121-1133. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020419[go to publisher's site]
- M.H. van Dijke, D. De Cremer, P. Schefferlie & A.E.R. Bos (2009). Procedural and interpersonal fairness moderate the relationship between outcome fairness and acceptance of merit pay. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18 (1), 8-28. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13594320701856699[go to publisher's site]
- D. De Cremer, D.M. Mayer, M.H. van Dijke, B.C. Schouten & M. Bardes (2009). When does self-sacrificial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on followers¿ prevention focus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94 (4), 887-899. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014782[go to publisher's site]
- G. Langendijk, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2009). How power and trust explain procedural fairness effects on self-esteem. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65, 118-126.
- D. De Cremer & M.H. van Dijke (2009). On the psychology of justice as a social regulation tool. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65 (4), 114-117. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03080133
- M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2008). How leader prototypicality influences followers’ status: The role of procedural fairness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17 (2), 226-250. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13594320701743491
- J.W. Van Prooijen, D. De Cremer, I. Van Beest, T. Stahl, M.H. van Dijke & P. Van Lange (2008). The egocentric nature of procedural justice: Social value orientation as moderator of reactions to decision-making procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44 (5), 1303-1315. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.05.006
- D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke, L.G.G. Brebels & N. Hoogervorst (2008). How intergroup dynamics influence within-group cooperation: The case of prototypical leadership and procedural fairness. Psychologica Belgica, 48, 157-175.
- D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & A.E.R. Bos (2007). When leaders are seen as transformational: The effects of organizational justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37 (8), 1797-1816. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00238.x[go to publisher's site]
- C. Bolman, L. Lechner & M.H. van Dijke (2007). Question order in the assessment of misperception of physical activity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 4, 42.
- P. Verboon & M.H. van Dijke (2007). A self-interest analysis of tax compliance: How distributive justice moderates the effect of outcome favorability. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 704-727.
- M.H. van Dijke & M. Poppe (2007). Motivations underlying power dynamics in hierarchically structured groups. Small Group Research, 38, 643-669.
- D. De Cremer, D. van Knippenberg, M.H. van Dijke & A.E.R. Bos (2006). Self-sacrificial leadership and follower self-esteem: When collective identification matters. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 10, 233-245. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.10.3.233
- D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & A. Bos (2006). Procedural Justice and Organizational Identification: Effects of Affect-Based and Cognition-Based Trust. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 27, 553-564.
- L. Lechner, C. Bolman & M.H. van Dijke (2006). Factors related to misperception of physical activity in the Netherlands and implications for health promotion programs. Health Promotion International, 21, 104-112.
- M.H. van Dijke & M. Poppe (2006). Personal power motives as a basis for social power dynamics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 537-556.
- D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & A.E.R. Bos (2004). Distributive justice moderating the effects of self-sacrificial leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 25 (5), 466-475.
- D. De Cremer, D. van Knippenberg, M.H. van Dijke & A. Bos (2004). Adding further evidence to the self-esteem – fairness treatment relationship: The moderating effect of social self-esteem. Social Justice Research, 17, 407-419.
- M.H. van Dijke & M. Poppe (2004). Social comparison of power: Interpersonal versus intergroup effects. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 8, 13-26.
- M.H. van Dijke & M. Poppe (2003). Preferred changes in power differences: Effects of social comparisons in equal and unequal power relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 149-160.
- K. Könings & M.H. van Dijke (2009). Predictoren en criteria. In M. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch Selecteren (pp. 59-78). Groningnen: Noordhoff Publishers
- M.H. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (2009). Trends in selectie. In M. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch Selecteren (pp. 263-276). Groningen: Noordhoff Publishers
- M.H. van Dijke & K. Proost (2009). Voorselectie. In M. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch selecteren (pp. 149-160). Groningen, The Netherlands:: Noordhoff Publishers.
- K. Proost & M.H. van Dijke (2009). Werving van personeel. In M..H. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch Selecteren. Groningen: Noordhoff Publishers
- M.H. van Dijke, G. van Houwelingen, N. Hoogervorst & L. Versteegt (2018). Reflection and action: A study on moral learning consultation within Dutch prison authorities. In M. Kowalski (Ed.), Ethics of counterterrorism. Amsterdam: Boom
- M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2014). Justice in the work setting. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research. Springer
- D. De Cremer & M.H. van Dijke (2009). Acting fairly to be the boss: Procedural justice as a tool to affirm power relationships with subordinates. In D. Tjosvold & B.M. van Knippenberg-Wisse (Eds.), Power and interdependence in organizations (pp. 118-132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- M.H. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Ed.). (2009). Strategisch selecteren. Groningen / Houten: Noordhoff Publishers
- G. Van Houwelingen, N. Hoogervorst & M.H. van Dijke (2015). Reflectie en actie. Een onderzoek naar moreel leeroverleg binnen Dienst Justitiële Instellingen (DJI). [Reflection and action. A study on moral learning consultation within DJI]. (Extern rapport). den Haag: WODC, ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie
- J. Stouten, M.H. van Dijke, D. Mayer, D. De Cremer & M. Euwema (2014). Can a Leader Be Too Ethical? (nieuwsbrief). Ideas for Leaders.
- N. Hoogervorst, D. De Cremer & M.H. van Dijke (2014). How Employees Win ‘Voice’ and Influence Decisions. (nieuwsbrief). Ideas for Leaders.
- P.T.M. Desmet, N. Hoogervorst & M.H. van Dijke (2014). Profits Vs Principles: Market Competition and Moral Transgression. (nieuwsbrief). Ideas for Leaders. (available: 1 May 2015).
- J. Syroit, E. Derous, M. Hommes, H. Lodewijckx, M.H. van Dijke & P. Poelmans (2002). Interventies in groepen: conflicthantering en mediation. Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland
- M.H. van Dijke (2014). Understanding immoral conduct in business settings. A behavioural ethics approach. (2014, december 19). Rotterdam: Erasmus Research Institute of Management
- G.N.G. Vanderveen, V.A.J. Frissen, H.W. Volberda & M.H. van Dijke (2018). International working conference on visualizations & law – Small grant of the Erasmus Initiative Dynamics of Inclusive Prosperity.
- P.T.M. Desmet, N. Hoogervorst & M.H. van Dijke (2014). Prophets vs. Profits: How Market Competition influences Leaders’ Disciplining Behavior. Best OB Paper Award for Outstanding Practical Implications for Management: . Overig.
- M.H. van Dijke. Understanding power dynamics. Effects of social comparison on tendencies to change power and power differences. UvT Prom./coprom.: M. Poppe & J. Rijsman.
Nottingham Business School, Nottingham Trent Univ.
- Start Date
- Jun/2013
- End Date
- Is current
- Place
- NOTTINGHAM
- Specialty
- Behavioral ethics
RSM BV
- Start Date
- Jan/2017
- End Date
- Is current
- Place
- ROTTERDAM
- Specialty
- Behavioral ethics
Leadership, Sustainability & Governance
- Title
- Leadership, Sustainability & Governance
- Year
- 2017
- Period
- T6, XTRA-IB2
- Year level
- bachelor 2 (International Business Administration), bachelor 2 (BSc Incoming Exchange), pre-master (Pre-master Business Administration (English language))
Scientific Integrity
- Title
- Scientific Integrity
- Year
- 2017
- Period
- ERIMT2
- Year level
- master (ERIM - Research Master in Business and Management)
Publishing Strategy
- Title
- Publishing Strategy
- Year
- 2017
- Period
- ERIMT2
- Year level
- master (ERIM - Research Master in Business and Management)
Thesis Proposal Writing
- Title
- Thesis Proposal Writing
- Year
- 2017
- Period
- ERIMT1
- Year level
- master
Leadership, sustainability & governance
- Title
- Leadership, sustainability & governance
- Year
- 2017
- Period
- TRIM6, XTRA-BA2
- Year level
- bachelor 2 (Bedrijfskunde (Business Administration)), pre-master (Pre-master Business Administration (Nederlandstalig))
Sustainability and Behavorial Ethics
- Title
- Sustainability and Behavorial Ethics
- Year
- 2017
- Period
- MCC2
- Year level
- master (Global Business & Sustainability)
Leander De Schutter
Open PhD projects in Value Based Organizing: Acting on unprecedented change
Lisanne Versteegt
Taking a moral intuition approach to behavioral ethics: On the nature of moral intuitions underlying (un)ethical behaviors in organizations
Lisanne Versteegt
Taking a moral intuition approach to behavioral ethics: On the nature of moral intuitions underlying (un)ethical behaviors in organizations
-
Laura M. Giurge
A Test of Time: A temporal and dynamic approach to power and ethics
-
Laura M. Giurge
A Test of Time: A temporal and dynamic approach to power and ethics
-
Lemessa Bayissa Gobena
Towards Integrating Antecedents of Voluntary Tax Compliance
-
Franziska Zuber
Looking at the Others. Studies on (un)ethical behavior and social relationships in organizations
-
Philip Eskenazi
The Accountable Animal: Naturalising the management control problem
-
Gijs van Houwelingen
Something to Rely On: The Influence of Stable and Fleeting Drivers on Moral Behavior
-
Gijs van Houwelingen
Something to Rely On: The Influence of Stable and Fleeting Drivers on Moral Behavior
-
Pieter Desmet
In Money we Trust? Trust Repair and the Psychology of Financial Compensations
-
Joost Leunissen
All Apologies: On the willingness of perpetrators to apologize
-
Joost Leunissen
All Apologies: On the willingness of perpetrators to apologize
-
Niek Hoogervorst
On The Psychology of Displaying Ethical Leadership. A Behavioral Ethics Approach
Pepijn van Neerijnen
The Adaptive Organization: The Socio-Cognitive Antecedents of Ambidexterity and Individual Exploration
Endowed Professor
- University
- Erasmus University Rotterdam
- School
- RSM - Rotterdam School of Management
- Department
- Department of Business-Society Management
- Country
- Nederland
- Telephone
- +31 10 4081913
Associate Professor
- University
- Erasmus University Rotterdam
- School
- RSM - Rotterdam School of Management
- Department
- Department of Business-Society Management
- Country
- Nederland
- Telephone
- +31 10 4081913