prof.dr. (Marius) M.H. van Dijke

All publications (91)

• Article (73)

  • Scholarly Publication (66)

    • X. Zheng, Y. Yuan, M.H. van Dijke, A. Van Hiel & D. De Cremer (2019). The Interactive Effect of a Leader’s Sense of Uniqueness and Sense of Belongingness on Followers’ Perceptions of Leader Authenticity. Journal of Business Ethics, Accepted. doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-4070-4
    • L.M. Giurge, M.H. van Dijke, X. Zheng & D. De Cremer (2019). Does Power Corrupt the Mind? The Influence of Power on Moral Reasoning and Self-Interested Behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, in press.
    • M.H. van Dijke, J.M. Leunissen, T. Wildschut & C. Sedikides (2019). Nostalgia Promotes Intrinsic Motivation and Effort in the Presence of Low Interactional Justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 150, 46-61.
    • M.H. van Dijke, D. De Cremer, G. Langendijk & C. Anderson (2018). Ranking low, feeling high: How hierarchical position and experienced power promote prosocial behavior in response to procedural justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103 (2), 164-181. doi: 10.1037/apl0000260
    • G. Van Houwelingen, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2018). Trust maintenance as a function of construal level and attributions: the case of apologies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 33-46. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2291
    • X. Zheng, M.H. van Dijke, J. Narayanan & D. De Cremer (2018). When expressing forgiveness backfires in the workplace: Victim power moderates the effect of expressing forgiveness on transgressor compliance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27 (1), 70-87. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2017.1392940
    • M.H. van Dijke, G. Van Houwelingen, D. De Cremer & L. De Schutter (2018). So gross and yet so far away: Psychological distance moderates the effect of disgust on moral judgment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 689-701. doi: 10.1177/1948550617722198
    • D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke, M. Schminke, L. De Schutter & J. Stouten (2018). The trickle-down effects of perceived trustworthiness on subordinate performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103 (12), 1335-1357. doi: 10.1037/apl0000339
    • G.G. van Houwelingen, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2017). Fairness Enactment as Response to Higher Level Unfairness. The Roles of Self-Construal and Spatial Distance. Journal of Management, 43 (2), 319-347. doi: 10.1177/0149206314530166
    • L.B. Gobena & M.H. van Dijke (2017). Fear and caring: Procedural justice, trust, and collective identification as antecedents of voluntary tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 62 (October), 1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2017.05.005
    • L.B. Gobena & M.H. van Dijke (2016). Power, justice, and trust: A moderated mediation analysis of voluntary tax compliance among Ethiopian small business owners. Journal of Economic Psychology, 52 (February), 24-37. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2015.11.004
    • X. Zheng, M.H. van Dijke, J.M. Leunissen, L.M. Giurge & D. De Cremer (2016). When saying sorry may not help: Transgressor power moderates the effect of an apology on forgiveness in the workplace. Human Relations, 69 (6), 1387-1418. doi: 10.1177/0018726715611236
    • S. van Gils, N. van Quaquebeke, D. van Knippenberg, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2015). Ethical leadership and follower organizational deviance: The moderating role of follower moral attentiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 190-203. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.08.005
    • M.H. van Dijke, D. De Cremer, L.G.G. Brebels & N. van Quaquebeke (2015). Willing and Able: Action-State Orientation and the relation between Procedural Justice and Employee Cooperation. Journal of Management, 41 (7), 1982-2003. doi: 10.1177/0149206313478187
    • M.H. van Dijke, T. Wildschut, J.M. Leunissen & C. Sedikides (2015). Nostalgia Buffers the Negative Impact of Low Procedural Justice on Cooperation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 127 (March), 15-29. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.11.005
    • E. Bianchi, J. Brockner, K. van den Bos, M. Seifert, H. Moon, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2015). Trust in decision-making authorities dictates the form of the interactive relationship between outcome favorability and procedural fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41 (1), 19-34. doi: 10.1177/0146167214556237
    • P.T.M. Desmet, N. Hoogervorst & M.H. van Dijke (2015). Prophets vs. profits: How market competition influences leaders' disciplining behavior of ethical transgressions. The Leadership Quarterly, 26 (6), 1034-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.07.004
    • G. Van Houwelingen, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2015). Getting it done and getting it right: Leader disciplinary reactions to followers' moral transgressions are determined by leader's construal level mindset. The Leadership Quarterly, 26 (5), 878-891. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.06.007
    • A. Joosten, M.H. van Dijke, A. Van Hiel & D. De Cremer (2015). Out of control!? How loss of self-control influences prosocial behavior: the role of power and moral values. PLoS One (online), 10 (5), 1-20. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126377
    • P.T.M. Desmet, N. Hoogervorst & M.H. van Dijke (2014). Prophets vs. Profits: How Market Competition Influences Leader's Disciplining Behavior. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014 (1):15818. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2014.119
    • J.M. Leunissen, D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & C.P. Reinders Folmer (2014). Forecasting Errors in the Averseness of an Apology. Social Justice Research, 27 (3), 322-339. doi: 10.1007/s11211-014-0216-4
    • A. Joosten, M.H. van Dijke, A. Van Hiel & D. De Cremer (2014). Feel good, do-good!? On consistency and compensation in moral self-regulation. Journal of Business Ethics, 123 (1), 71-83. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1794-z
    • L.G.G. Brebels, D. De Cremer & M.H. Van Dijke (2014). Using self-definition to predict the influence of procedural justice on organizational, interpersonal, and task-oriented citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 40 (3), 731-763. doi: 10.1177/0149206311410605
    • A. Joosten, M.H. van Dijke, A. Van Hiel & D. De Cremer (2014). Being `in Control' May Make You Lose control: The Role of Self-Regulation in Unethical Leadership Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 121 (1), 1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1686-2
    • F.M. Cramwinckel, D. De Cremer & M.H. van Dijke (2013). Dirty hands make dirty leaders?! How the touching of dirty objects leads to higher rewards for unethical followers. Journal of Business Ethics, 115 (1), 93-100. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1385-4
    • J. Stouten, M.H. van Dijke, D. Mayer, D. De Cremer & M. Euwema (2013). Can a leader be seen as too ethical? The curvilinear effects of ethical leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 24 (5), 680-695. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.05.002
    • N. Hoogervorst, D. De Cremer & M.H. van Dijke (2013). When do Leaders Grant Voice? How Leaders' Perceptions of Followers' Control and Belongingness Needs Affect the Enactment of Fair Procedures. Human Relations, 66 (7), 973-992. doi: 10.1177/0018726713482150
    • J.M. Leunissen, D. De Cremer, C.P. Reinders Folmer & M.H. van Dijke (2013). The Apology Mismatch: Asymmetries Between Victim's Need for Apologies and Perpetrator's. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49 (3), 315-324. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.005
    • B. Geenen, K. Proost, M.H. van Dijke, K. De Witte & J. von Grumbkow (2012). The role of affect in the relationship between distributive justice expectations and applicants' recommendation and litigation intentions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20 (4), 404-413. doi: 10.1111/ijsa.12003
    • B. Geenen, K. Proost, B. Schreurs, M.H. van Dijke, E. Derous, K. De Witte & J. von Grumbkow (2012). The influence of general beliefs on the formation of justice expectations: The moderating role of direct experiences. Career Development International, 17 (1), 67-82. doi: 10.1108/13620431211201337
    • P. Verboon & M.H. van Dijke (2012). The effect of perceived deterrence on compliance with authorities: The moderating influence of procedural justice. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 1, 151-161.
    • D.M. Mayer, S. Thau, K.S. Workman, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2012). Leader Mistreatment, Employee Hostility, and Deviant Behaviors: Integrating Self-Uncertainty and Thwarted Needs Perspectives on Deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117 (1), 24-40. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.003
    • J. Stouten, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2012). Ethical leadership. An overview and future perspecfives. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11 (1), 1-6. doi: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000059
    • K. Proost, J. Van Ruysseveldt & M.H. van Dijke (2012). Coping with unmet expectations: Learning opportunities as a buffer against emotional exhaustion and turnover intentions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21 (1), 7-27. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2010.526304
    • M.H. van Dijke, D. De Cremer, D.M. Mayer & N. van Quaquebeke (2012). When Does Procedural Fairness Promote Organizational Citizenship Behavior?: Integrating Empowering Leadership Types in Relational Justice Models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117 (2), 235-248. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.10.006
    • N. Hoogervorst, D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & D.M. Mayer (2012). When do leaders sacrifice? The effects of sense of power and belongingness on leader self-sacrifice. The Leadership Quarterly, 23 (5), 883-896. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.05.006
    • L.G.G. Brebels, D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & A. van Hiel (2011). Fairness as social responsibility: a moral self-regulation account of procedural justice enactment. British Journal of Management, 22 (SI), S47-S58. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00715.x
    • P. Verboon & M.H. van Dijke (2011). When do severe sanctions enhance compliance? The role of procedural fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32 (1), 120-130. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2010.09.007
    • M.H. Van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2011). When social accounts promote acceptance of unfair ultimatum offers: The role of the victim's stress responses to uncertainty and power position. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32 (3), 468-479. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2011.03.014
    • J. Van Ruysseveldt & M.H. Van Dijke (2011). When Are workload and workplace learning opportunities related in a curvilinear manner? The moderating role of autonomy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79 (2), 470-483. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.03.003
    • M.H. van Dijke & P. Verboon (2010). Trust in authorities as a boundary condition to procedural fairness effects on tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31 (1), 80-91. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2009.10.005
    • D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & D.M. Mayer (2010). Cooperating when "you" and "I" are treated fairly: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95 (6), 1121-1133. doi: 10.1037/a0020419
    • M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2010). Procedural fairness and endorsement of prototypical leaders: Leader benevolence or follower control? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46 (1), 85-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.004
    • D. De Cremer, J. Brockner, A. Fishman, M.H. Van Dijke, W. van Olffen & D.M. Mayer (2010). When do procedural fairness and outcome fairness interact to influence employees' work attitudes and behaviors? The moderation effect of uncertainty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95 (2), 291-304. doi: 10.1037/a0017866
    • M.H. Van Dijke, D. De Cremer & D. Mayer (2010). The role of authority power in explaining procedural fairness effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95 (3), 488-502. doi: 10.1037/a0018921
    • D. De Cremer, A. Tenbrunsel & M.H. van Dijke (2010). Regulating Ethical Failures: Insights from Psychology. Journal of Business Ethics, 95 (supplement 1), 1-6. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0789-x
    • N. Hoogervoorst, D. De Cremer & M.H. van Dijke (2010). Why Leaders Not Always Disapprove of Unethical Follower Behavior: It depends on the leader's self-interest and accountability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95 (supplement 1), 29-41. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0793-1
    • D. De Cremer, D.M. Mayer, M.H. van Dijke, B.C. Schouten & M. Bardes (2009). When does self-sacrificial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on followers¿ prevention focus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94 (4), 887-899. doi: 10.1037/a0014782
    • G. Langendijk, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2009). How power and trust explain procedural fairness effects on self-esteem. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65, 118-126.
    • D. De Cremer & M.H. van Dijke (2009). On the psychology of justice as a social regulation tool. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65 (4), 114-117. doi: 10.1007/BF03080133
    • M.H. van Dijke, D. De Cremer, P. Schefferlie & A.E.R. Bos (2009). Procedural and interpersonal fairness moderate the relationship between outcome fairness and acceptance of merit pay. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18 (1), 8-28. doi: 10.1080/13594320701856699
    • J.W. Van Prooijen, D. De Cremer, I. Van Beest, T. Stahl, M.H. van Dijke & P. Van Lange (2008). The egocentric nature of procedural justice: Social value orientation as moderator of reactions to decision-making procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44 (5), 1303-1315. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.05.006
    • M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2008). How leader prototypicality influences followers’ status: The role of procedural fairness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17 (2), 226-250. doi: 10.1080/13594320701743491
    • D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke, L.G.G. Brebels & N. Hoogervorst (2008). How intergroup dynamics influence within-group cooperation: The case of prototypical leadership and procedural fairness. Psychologica Belgica, 48, 157-175.
    • M.H. van Dijke & M. Poppe (2007). Motivations underlying power dynamics in hierarchically structured groups. Small Group Research, 38, 643-669.
    • D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & A.E.R. Bos (2007). When leaders are seen as transformational: The effects of organizational justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37 (8), 1797-1816. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00238.x
    • P. Verboon & M.H. van Dijke (2007). A self-interest analysis of tax compliance: How distributive justice moderates the effect of outcome favorability. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 704-727.
    • C. Bolman, L. Lechner & M.H. van Dijke (2007). Question order in the assessment of misperception of physical activity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 4, 42.
    • D. De Cremer, D. van Knippenberg, M.H. van Dijke & A.E.R. Bos (2006). Self-sacrificial leadership and follower self-esteem: When collective identification matters. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 10, 233-245. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.10.3.233
    • D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & A. Bos (2006). Procedural Justice and Organizational Identification: Effects of Affect-Based and Cognition-Based Trust. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 27, 553-564.
    • L. Lechner, C. Bolman & M.H. van Dijke (2006). Factors related to misperception of physical activity in the Netherlands and implications for health promotion programs. Health Promotion International, 21, 104-112.
    • M.H. van Dijke & M. Poppe (2006). Personal power motives as a basis for social power dynamics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 537-556.
    • D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & A.E.R. Bos (2004). Distributive justice moderating the effects of self-sacrificial leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 25 (5), 466-475.
    • D. De Cremer, D. van Knippenberg, M.H. van Dijke & A. Bos (2004). Adding further evidence to the self-esteem – fairness treatment relationship: The moderating effect of social self-esteem. Social Justice Research, 17, 407-419.
    • M.H. van Dijke & M. Poppe (2004). Social comparison of power: Interpersonal versus intergroup effects. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 8, 13-26.
    • M.H. van Dijke & M. Poppe (2003). Preferred changes in power differences: Effects of social comparisons in equal and unequal power relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 149-160.

  • Professional Publication (7)

    • M.H. van Dijke (2018). The influence of power on prosocial behaviour. RSM Discovery - Management Knowledge, 33 (1), 5-7.
    • M.H. van Dijke, S.R. Giessner, R. Van Tulder & R.I. Gilbert (2014). What value ethical leadership? RSM Discovery - Management Knowledge, 18 (2), 8-11.
    • D. De Cremer, G.G. van Houwelingen, I. Cornelis, N. Hoogervorst, L.G.G. Brebels, M.H. van Dijke & A. Van Hiel (2014). Are leaders fair? On the need to understand fairness management in organizations. European Business Review, July-Augus, 6-8.
    • M.H. van Dijke (2013). A broader perspective: Harmonizing leadership activities. RSM Insight, 13 (1), 16-17.
    • D. De Cremer, J.M. Leunissen, C.P. Reinders Folmer & M.H. van Dijke (2012). Sorry limited. Business Strategy Review, 23 (3), 76-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8616.2012.00882.x
    • J.V.R. Van Ruysseveldt & M.H. van Dijke (2012). Wanneer bevordert en wanneer hindert werkdruk het werkplek leren? Gedrag en Organisatie, 25, 28-44.
    • K. Zamani & M.H. van Dijke (2007). Virtueel Laboratorium: Onderzoeken op afstand. De Psycholoog, 42, 379-380.

• Book / Monograph / Book editorial (1)

  • J. Syroit, E. Derous, M. Hommes, H. Lodewijckx, M.H. van Dijke & P. Poelmans (2002). Interventies in groepen: conflicthantering en mediation. Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland

• Part of book - Chapter (8)

  • Scholarly Publication (4)

    • P. Manjunath & M.H. van Dijke (2019). Trickle-down effects of unethical behavior: The role of meaning making. In D. Wasieleski & J. Weber (Eds.), BAS 360 series on Business Ethics. Bingley, UK: Emerald
    • M.H. van Dijke, G. van Houwelingen, N. Hoogervorst & L. Versteegt (2018). Reflection and action: A study on moral learning consultation within Dutch prison authorities. In M. Kowalski (Ed.), Ethics of counterterrorism. Amsterdam: Boom
    • M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2014). Justice in the work setting. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research. Springer
    • D. De Cremer & M.H. van Dijke (2009). Acting fairly to be the boss: Procedural justice as a tool to affirm power relationships with subordinates. In D. Tjosvold & B.M. van Knippenberg-Wisse (Eds.), Power and interdependence in organizations (pp. 118-132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

  • Professional Publication (4)

    • K. Könings & M.H. van Dijke (2009). Predictoren en criteria. In M. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch Selecteren (pp. 59-78). Groningnen: Noordhoff Publishers
    • M.H. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (2009). Trends in selectie. In M. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch Selecteren (pp. 263-276). Groningen: Noordhoff Publishers
    • M.H. van Dijke & K. Proost (2009). Voorselectie. In M. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch selecteren (pp. 149-160). Groningen, The Netherlands:: Noordhoff Publishers.
    • K. Proost & M.H. van Dijke (2009). Werving van personeel. In M..H. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch Selecteren. Groningen: Noordhoff Publishers

• Other output (1)

  • G.N.G. Vanderveen, V.A.J. Frissen, H.W. Volberda & M.H. van Dijke (2018). International working conference on visualizations & law – Small grant of the Erasmus Initiative Dynamics of Inclusive Prosperity.

• Book editorship (1)

  • M.H. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Ed.). (2009). Strategisch selecteren. Groningen / Houten: Noordhoff Publishers

• Report (1)

  • G. Van Houwelingen, N. Hoogervorst & M.H. van Dijke (2015). Reflectie en actie. Een onderzoek naar moreel leeroverleg binnen Dienst Justitiële Instellingen (DJI). [Reflection and action. A study on moral learning consultation within DJI]. (Extern rapport). den Haag: WODC, ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie

• Internet article (3)

  • J. Stouten, M.H. van Dijke, D. Mayer, D. De Cremer & M. Euwema (2014). Can a Leader Be Too Ethical? (nieuwsbrief). Ideas for Leaders.
  • N. Hoogervorst, D. De Cremer & M.H. van Dijke (2014). How Employees Win ‘Voice’ and Influence Decisions. (nieuwsbrief). Ideas for Leaders.
  • P.T.M. Desmet, N. Hoogervorst & M.H. van Dijke (2014). Profits Vs Principles: Market Competition and Moral Transgression. (nieuwsbrief). Ideas for Leaders. (available: 1 May 2015).

• Inaugural speech (1)

  • M.H. van Dijke (2014). Understanding immoral conduct in business settings. A behavioural ethics approach. (2014, december 19). Rotterdam: Erasmus Research Institute of Management

• Doctoral thesis (1)

  • M.H. van Dijke. Understanding power dynamics. Effects of social comparison on tendencies to change power and power differences. UvT Prom./coprom.: M. Poppe & J. Rijsman.

• Award (1)

  • P.T.M. Desmet, N. Hoogervorst & M.H. van Dijke (2014). Prophets vs. Profits: How Market Competition influences Leaders’ Disciplining Behavior. Best OB Paper Award for Outstanding Practical Implications for Management: . Populariserende publicatie.

Ancillary activities (2)

PhD list (15)

Present position