Principles and Flexibility in Multiple Testing

EI Seminar
Campus Woudestein with trees with red leaves and students walking through wooden benches

Closed testing is known to underlie many multiple testing methods. Any method controlling a tail probability of a number or proportion of errors is either equivalent to a closed testing procedure or is uniformly improved by one. We extend closed testing to a novel necessary and sufficient principle for all multiple testing methods controlling any expected loss.

Speaker
Jelle Goeman
Date
Thursday 8 Oct 2026, 12:00 - 13:00
Type
Seminar
Room
ET-14
Location
Campus Woudestein
Add to calendar

This e-Closure principle asserts that every such multiple testing method is a special case of a generalized closed testing procedure based on e-values. It applies to a large class of error rates — in particular to the false discovery rate (FDR). We show that any procedure controlling FDR is either a e-Closure  method or is uniformly improved by one. By writing existing methods as special cases of this procedure, we show uniform improvements, as we demonstrate for the Benjamini-Hochberg and the Benjamini-Yekutieli procedures. We also show that methods derived using our novel e-Closure Principle generally control their error rate not just for one rejected set, but simultaneously over many, allowing post hoc flexibility for the researcher. 

This flexibility is important in many application areas including neuroimaging and genomics. Moreover, we show that because all multiple testing methods for all error metrics are derived from the same procedure, researchers may even choose the error metric post hoc, allowing post hoc switching from e.g. familywise error to FDR. Under certain conditions, this flexibility even extends to post hoc choice of the nominal error rate.

See also

Bayesian Double Machine Learning for Causal Inference

Laura Liu (University of Pittsburgh)
Image of campus Woudestein

A robust test for equal predictive accuracy

Yannick Hoga (Universität Duisburg-Essen)
Footbridge with 'Creating positive societal impact' at Woudestein campus, students walking underneath.

Higher-Order Neyman Orthogonality in Moment-Condition Models

Martin Weidner (Oxford)
Campus Woudestein met het oog op het fontein

Liquidity-Adjusted Expected Shortfall Tests

Ekaterina Kazak (Birmingham)
Campus Woudestein, showcasing the flags of the School's and Institutes.

FinEML Conference 2026

Financial Econometrics Meets Machine Learning
Image - University of Geneva

Heuristics and Anchored Inflation: How do Different Types of Consumers Change Their Minds about Inflation?

Kevin Lee (University of Nottingham)
Inside view of the Polak building.

Outrigger local polynomial regression

Richard Samworth (Cambridge)
Campus Woudestein met het oog op het fontein
More information

Do you want to know more about the event? Contact the secretariat Econometrics at eb-secr@ese.eur.nl.

Compare @count study programme

  • @title

    • Duration: @duration
Compare study programmes